<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.pflogging.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Pathfinding</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A case study of implementing systematic improvements</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3911</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img class=&quot;picture-right&quot; src=&quot;/filestore/u14/Aim.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Person aiming arrow at target&quot; title=&quot;Aim&quot; hspace=&quot;2&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; width=&quot;224&quot; height=&quot;189&quot; /&gt;The term &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/health_care_reform&quot; title=&quot;reference on health care reform&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;health care reform&lt;/a&gt; has diverse meanings for the many stakeholders involved in the US &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/health_care_system&quot; title=&quot;reference on health care system&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;health care system&lt;/a&gt;. The underlying issues associated with implementing such reforms are quite complex, but pressures for reform are high. In 2005 alone, the United States spent more than two trillion dollars on health care, or over $7,100 per person, and are growing at over twice the rate of growth of our overall economy. Government and private insurance fund about 80 percent of those costs, and the rest largely comes directly (rather than indirectly) out of our pockets. About a third of these expenditures occur within hospitals; clinicians get another third, and the rest is spread across nursing homes, prescription drugs, and the costs of administering our insurance system. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/3911&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3911#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/838">Analytics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/1">Change management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/362">Evidence-based management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/357">Self-organizing community development</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:38:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3911 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Playbooks and fishing lessons, instead of more laws and sermons</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/2606</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img class=&quot;picture-right&quot; src=&quot;/filestore/u14/Coach.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Coach holding player up to make basket&quot; title=&quot;Coaching&quot; hspace=&quot;2&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; width=&quot;108&quot; height=&quot;108&quot; /&gt;Processes are as difficult to develop as products, and when considering &lt;a href=&quot;/node/3916&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;cultural issues&lt;/a&gt;, can be even more difficult.  Unfortunately, developing or improving a process often isn&#039;t taken as seriously as a product development effort is... and as a result, the quality of the outputs from such process improvements can have very detrimental impacts on users, who have to try to muddle on, and may find themselves having to build products and fix proceses at the same time. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/2606&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/2606#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/788">Facilitation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/359">Governance frameworks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/384">Process-based improvements</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/365">Standards and best practices</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:18:59 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2606 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Identifying opportunities for developing effectiveness</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3683</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img class=&quot;picture-right&quot; src=&quot;/filestore/u14/Scope_0.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Stethescope&quot; title=&quot;Stethescope&quot; hspace=&quot;2&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; /&gt;In becoming more effective, either as an individual or a business, should one only focus on the business results that are desired, or are the means to those ends equally important? Is it enough to care passionately about goals and be able to clearly articulate their importance and why they matter to customers, or is it equally important to chart an efficient path which will reach those goals, navigate and anticipate risks along the way, and respond effectively to issues as they arise? Which of these two types of criteria - results vs means - is best for our use in evaluating performance? Which is more important as leverage to enable improvements? I&#039;d like to tackle these questions indirectly, by showing how they relate to an important current problem at the national level. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/3683&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3683#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/802">Focus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/8">Diagnosing</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 09:55:21 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3683 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Management innovation</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3632</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In &lt;em&gt;The Future of Management&lt;/em&gt;, Gary Hamel challenges traditional thinking on the practice of management. He argues that management innovation is needed since more traditional approaches - centered on control and efficiency - no longer work in a world where adaptability and creativity are increasingly crucial to business success. He argues that current management challenges most frequently are focused around how to accelerate change, get everyone involved in innovation, and engaged to give their best - and none of these goals can be achieved very effectively (or sustainably) in a command and control-oriented environment. I couldn&#039;t agree more. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hamel offers a somewhat traditionalist job description for a manager, which is to: 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/3632&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3632#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/817">Future of management quotes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/804">Innovation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/357">Self-organizing community development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/377">Talent management</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:20:09 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3632 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Becoming competent in managing competency</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3581</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So what is a way forward, if we are to adopt a competency-based management practice? 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt;Refer to &lt;a href=&quot;/taxonomy/term/361&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;/&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;improvement strategies&lt;span style=&quot;color:black&quot;&gt; on this site for sources of material.&lt;/span&gt;
	&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3581#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/385">Bodies of knowledge</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/371">Knowledge management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/365">Standards and best practices</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:08:51 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3581 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pursuing a meaningful definition of competency</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3579</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
No meaningful progress can be made in the effective use of any competency concept without a clear definition of what it means to be competent, and how to separate the wheat from the chaff. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/3579&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3579#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/385">Bodies of knowledge</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/405">Communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/371">Knowledge management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/357">Self-organizing community development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/365">Standards and best practices</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:43:25 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3579 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Keeping the customer happy</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3571</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
See &lt;a href=&quot;http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail1749.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this podcast&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;#160;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3571#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:59:45 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3571 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How does one learn a lesson?</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3461</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;img class=&quot;picture-right&quot; src=&quot;/filestore/u14/Handoff.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Two runners handing off a scroll&quot; title=&quot;Handoff&quot; hspace=&quot;2&quot; vspace=&quot;2&quot; width=&quot;236&quot; height=&quot;128&quot; /&gt;What is a lesson learned? Simply put, it is is knowledge or understanding gained by experience (whether positive or negative), and which adds significant, valid, and relevant new information that would be useful in accomplishing a business objective. 
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/3461&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3461#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/380">Execution discipline</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/805">Gatekeeping</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/371">Knowledge management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/803">Storytelling</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/364">Requirements-driven development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/375">Quality management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/346">Surveying</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/8">Diagnosing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/100">Filtering</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:46:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3461 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re-thinking the problem</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3368</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(explain about abandoning hope, selecting a new architecture, then stumbling across a fix in the craziest of places - Outlook!) 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Cite the many recent MCE patches rolled out. The good - they fixed it. The bad - I got there before they did. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Finally mention (one more time) that &lt;a href=&quot;http://dotnet.org.za/codingsanity/archive/2007/12/14/review-windows-xp.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;XP may be an upgrade&lt;/a&gt;. None of this, though, seems to have hurt Microsoft, as they continue to see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/24/microsoft-trumpets-record-second-quarter-results/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;dramatic growth in revenue and profits&lt;/a&gt; (but not stock price).  
 &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pflogging.com/node/3368&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3368#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:26:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3368 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Watching who is advocating the merits of synergy</title>
 <link>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3332</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Need to worry about who is really big on synergy, and you&#039;ll discover it&#039;s ususally the groups that will most benefit from it - the implementors of the infrastructure, the designated evangelists of the vision, and the change agents themselves.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It&#039;s the content, stupid! 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.pflogging.com/node/3332#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.pflogging.com/taxonomy/term/404">Pathfinding</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:29:55 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bryan Pflug</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3332 at http://www.pflogging.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
