Home

Pflogging

the never-ending quest for pragmatic solutions, useful plans, flawless execution, and designs that endure
Home Areas of interest Conventional wisdom Risk management

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

A number of key features are only available to registered users. They include:

  • Access to the full content of top-rated material (only teasers are available to anonymous users after the material has been posted for 45 days)
  • The ability to search site content
  • The ability to access reviews of books relevant to site material
  • The ability to access key quotes relevant to site material
  • The ability to access content from partner sites
  • The ability to rate material
  • The ability to post comments
  • The ability to post new information and propose it for publication
  • The ability to request email notification when selected content is added or updated

Insurance for project hazards

  • View
  • links
Submitted by Bryan Pflug on Sun, 01/28/2007 - 08:17
  • Risk management

This page is an early sketch of an outline of the challenges of risk management. It is incomplete and immature.
The intent is to demonstrate the feasibility, issues, and benefits with establishing a standardized,
scalable approach to risk management that is compliant with multiple improvement frameworks, highlight the various features
of such a process description and protocol (and demonstrate the differences between these), and walk through
how such an example could be used to explore opportunities for improved information sharing, knowledge management, and automation

Introduction

If you can prove you don't need insurance, you can probably get it - source unknown

Risk management is the process of minimizing exposure to hazards. Nearly everyone purchases insurance for their own home, though this is usually because most financial institutions require it as a condition of financing. Most project leaders say they practice it, but rarely is it applied in an organized, methological manner. Consider this dialog:

Manager: We want to be sure we manage the risks on this project, but don't want to call them risks.

Worker: What's wrong with calling them risks?

Manager: If we call them that, we'll have to develop mitigation plans, and that's a real pain in the butt. Also, there are outside groups that rain down on us if we admit to risks. Better to keep them to ourselves.

Worker: So what do we do?

Manager: Let's just call them issues, and work them as hard as we can.

The primary purpose of risk management

Risk management as insurance

Reference learnings from financial risk management.

Reference risk management and insurance

Why people buy insurance

Describe how insurance companies work

How much insurance do you need if your project is not under control?

Transitioning risks to issues

A common risk process

Sources of requirements for a common risk process

Challenges in developing and transitioning to a common process

Reference example risk management process description.

Tooling for the process

The risk management value stream

Stakeholder perspectives

What are the 'holes' in typical risk management approaches?

Effective capture of all risks

See risk checklist.

Consistent categorization of risks

Allocating sufficient resources to risk mitigation

Disagreements over the classification of risks

Reference Risk management criteria

Challenges of rolling out risk management across an enterprise

Reference Synergy: Show me the money!

0
Your rating: None
  • Login or register to post comments